Public reading

Bejuco, Nandayure, Guanacaste

Shaded-relief view of the terrain around Bejuco, Nandayure, Guanacaste, the parcel boundary drawn in gold
500 m
Shaded relief · AWS Terrain Tiles
54Land Score

Workable land — the plan must come before the capital.

Bejuco, Nandayure, Guanacaste

Four of five readings

soil unavailable — weight redistributed across the rest.

The parcel from orbit

Finding the latest clear satellite pass…

Reading the place

This 100-hectare parcel near Bejuco, Nandayure, Guanacaste is workable land whose plan must come before the capital, scoring 54 out of 100. The reading that most shapes the work here is that about 42% of the parcel is permanently under water. The first move: map how water moves and stands across the parcel before siting anything on it.

Riskhigh confidence

About 42% of the parcel is permanently under water.

This area cannot be built on or farmed without major drainage or fill work, so it reduces the usable land and the cost of developing it.

42% permanent open water, plus 8% under seasonal water (JRC Global Surface Water, 1984–2021).

Riskmedium confidence

This area is highly exposed to projected climate change by 2050.

Large shifts in temperature and rainfall can change what the land can support, so any plan should be built around the projected conditions, not current ones.

Projected change by 2050: +1.1 °C mean temperature, +44.7% rainfall. Exposure rated High.

Waterhigh confidence

Rainfall is high and supports rain-fed use.

There is enough water for most crops and forestry with little or no irrigation; dry-season storage still helps. Rainfall has also been rising, which can bring more intense wet seasons; plan drainage accordingly.

2,973 mm of rain per year. Nearest mapped watercourse is about 1.28 km away. Up about 43% over 20 years.

Terrainhigh confidence

The land is flat.

Flat ground is easy to build on, farm, and mechanize, though low flat land can drain poorly and should be checked for waterlogging.

Mean elevation 7 m, mean slope 2°, 20 m of relief.

Biodiversityhigh confidence

The area has a rich record of documented wildlife.

High biodiversity adds conservation value, may bring species-protection rules, and can support eco-tourism or habitat-credit programs.

2,444 biodiversity records nearby, including Coragyps atratus and Pelecanus occidentalis (GBIF).

Soillow confidence

No satellite soil data is available for this parcel.

Soil quality cannot be assessed remotely here, so a ground survey is needed before any agricultural or restoration decision.

The SoilGrids survey returned no data for this location.

Accesshigh confidence

Road and town access are close.

Good access lowers development and logistics costs but can raise encroachment pressure and land prices.

About 0.81 km to the nearest road.

Confidence reflects the data behind each reading: high when clear passes or strong sources agree, medium on a partial or single-source signal, low where the data is sparse or indirect. A low-confidence reading usually needs one more clear pass, or a check on the ground.

What the land is telling us

Read across the record, the land reads as stable to regenerating: the core cover and water signals are holding, which means the work is to build on a sound base rather than to reverse a decline.

Of the land's core processes, the water cycle reads as adequate to abundant, so the question is less supply than how well the land captures and holds what falls and community dynamics look rich, with a deep record of documented life nearby. What orbit cannot see is what happens below the surface — soil biology, structure, and the carbon held in the ground — so treat those as the first things to confirm underfoot.

Taken together, this is workable land whose plan must come before the capital.

Where the capital goes · corridor & deployment

19Conservation priority
FrontierBuffer / matrix

Standalone conservation value, outside the mapped network.

standalone value, outside the mapped network

Nearest declared corridor: Corredor Biológico Pájaro Campana, about 37 km · Área de Conservación Arenal-Tempisque (ACAT)

This reads as working land best held as a buffer, scoring 19 out of 100 for conservation priority. It carries standalone value outside the mapped network — worth holding on its own terms.

39/100
Hospitality fit

The funding layer: a small, low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground, sized to carry the restoration — never spending the habitat it depends on.

Corridorlow confidence

The nearest declared corridor is the Corredor Biológico Pájaro Campana, about 37 km away (screening).

The parcel reads as outside the mapped network, so its connectivity value comes from what it holds and what protected land sits beside it rather than a corridor mandate. That corridor links Reserva Biológica Bosque Nuboso Monteverde, Golfo de Nicoya.

Nearest PNCB screening extent ~37 km. Extents are approximate — confirm against SINAC/PNCB.

Conservationmedium confidence

This reads as working land — its role is to buffer the core, not to be the core.

Land like this holds the corridor's edge: kept in low-impact use, it shields the intact habitat beside it from encroachment and gives the network room to breathe.

24% tree cover.

Hospitalitylow confidence

A modest hospitality layer is possible, but it is not the strongest card.

In the regenerative model the lodging is a means, not the end: a low-footprint operation sited on the already-worked ground earns the revenue that funds the restoration and stewardship, while the core is left to recover. Kept small, it also gives the corridor local guardians with a reason to hold it.

Hospitality fit 39/100, drawing on the setting. Site any building on the disturbed matrix, not the habitat.

Capital moves

  1. 01

    Tie up the land before restoring it — purchase or an easement that holds through a sale.

    Before committing

    Restoration is a multi-year investment; without secure tenure the connectivity it builds can be undone by the next owner.

    Confirm on the ground · Trace the title with a local lawyer and pull the cadastral record; check FONAFIFO PSA eligibility (reforestation or regeneration) for the parcel.

  2. 02

    Thicken cover along the parcel's edges and watercourses to widen what species can move through.

    First year

    As a stepping stone or buffer, the parcel's contribution is its edges and riparian strips — the parts that link to the habitat next door.

    Confirm on the ground · With an ecologist, identify the connecting strips worth planting first; confirm which watercourses cross the land at the end of the dry season.

  3. 03

    Set a connectivity baseline and re-read it — camera traps and the species the corridor was declared for.

    Ongoing

    Funders and partners judge a corridor by whether wildlife actually moves through it; a repeatable baseline is what turns the thesis into evidence and steers the next round of capital.

    Confirm on the ground · Run camera traps and species counts on a fixed schedule — track the indicator species named for this corridor (An altitudinal corridor carrying the three-wattled bellbird's migration from the Monteverde cloud forest down to the Gulf of Nicoya mangroves).

The deployment reading is a screening lens layered on the Land Score — it points capital at the land where it builds the most connectivity, and each move is paired with the ground-truth step that confirms it. Corridor extents are approximate PNCB screening footprints; confirm a parcel against the official SINAC/PNCB record.

Best-fit regenerative model

Coastal buffer · blue–green

73/100 fit

Protect the blue–green edge.

Low-lying at 7 m, this reads as a coastal edge — the buffer to protect and restore for blue carbon, storm defence, and nursery habitat.

Low-lying coastal or wetland ground where mangrove, marsh, and dry forest meet the sea. Protect and restore the buffer — blue carbon, storm defence, nursery habitat.

7 m elevation24% forest1.5° slope2,973 mm rain/yrcorridor ~37 km

Also consider · Regenerative agroforestry estate (44) · Watershed protection (30)

A published, rules-based suggestion read from the parcel's own indicators — forest, water, slope, access, and its place in the network. It names the shape of project the land is already set up to carry; confirm it against tenure, soils, and what you know from the ground.

What to do

  1. 01

    Map how water moves and stands across the parcel before siting anything on it.

    First visit

    A large share reads as standing or saturated ground, which sets what can be built, farmed, or drained, and where.

    Confirm on the ground · Walk the low ground at the end of the wet season and after heavy rain; a hydrologist can confirm the drainage pattern.

  2. 02

    Design to the 2050 climate projections rather than today's conditions.

    First year

    The land is strongly exposed to projected change, so species, water storage, and infrastructure should be chosen for the conditions ahead.

    Confirm on the ground · Cross-check the projections against the memory of long-time residents on how the seasons have already shifted here.

  3. 03

    Commission a ground soil survey before any agricultural or restoration decision.

    Before committing

    Satellites cannot read soil biology, structure, or below-ground carbon — the very things that decide what will grow — and no survey data is available here.

    Confirm on the ground · Take samples across the parcel for a lab test of organic carbon, texture, and pH, and dig a pit to read the profile and rooting depth.

  4. 04

    Confirm soil and water on the ground, then design to what the land can carry.

    First visit

    The land is workable, but the plan has to be built to its limits rather than around a hoped-for use.

    Confirm on the ground · Ground-truth the key constraints before committing to a use, then size the plan to them.

Questions to sit with

  • Which of the wet ground is a problem to drain, and which is an asset to keep — and who downstream depends on how you answer that?
  • If the seasons here shift as the models expect, which of your intentions for the land still hold — and which need rethinking now?
  • Are you here to hold this land as it is, to work it, or to help it change — and does the reading above serve that intention?
  • If the work succeeds, what do the water, the canopy, and the people around this land look like a generation from now — and what is the first condition that has to change for that to begin?
  • Where does this reading disagree with what you have seen walking the land? That disagreement is the first thing to check on the ground.

These are not data gaps — they are the questions the data cannot answer.

Reading the land's record…

How it compares

42ndpercentile · Tropical · Neotropic

Ranked against 31 readings · same thermal belt

About typical for the 31 readings logged in Tropical · Neotropic. Water is its strongest signal here (73rd percentile), climate resilience its weakest (5th). Land reads stronger toward the north-west.

Percentile by reading · higher is better land

Water
73rd
Ecology
27th
Climate
5th
Low pressure
68th

Landscape · 5 readings within 47 km

  • ·Land reads stronger toward the north-west

Percentiles compare this reading against the growing corpus of public TERRA readings in like land — not all land on Earth. They sharpen as the wall grows.

Climate · to 2050

26.4°C
Mean temp
+1.1°C
2050 Δ temp
+45%
2050 Δ rain

Exposure · High

2050 sits within a single planning horizon — about 24 years out. The models expect seasons here about 1.1°C warmerthan today's, with 45% more rain. Expect is the honest verb: this is the middle of a range of futures, not a certainty — so design to the range, not to today.

Water

2,973mm/yr
Rainfall
+42.9%
20-yr trend
1.3km
To watercourse
42%
Permanent water
8% seasonal

Río Bejuco · Río Ciego · Quebrada Milagro · Río Javillo

Soil · 0–30 cm

Source unavailable for this parcel.

Terrain & cover

7m
Elevation
1.5°
Mean slope
24%
Forest
1%
Built
Water 49%Grassland 24%Tree cover 24%Bare / sparse 3%Built-up 1%

Ecology

2,444
Recorded wildlife observations
GBIF

Coragyps atratus · Pelecanus occidentalis · Tyrannus melancholicus · Buteogallus anthracinus

Pressure

0.8km
To road
km
To settlement

Costa Rica ecological corridor

Nearby
Corridor
~37 km away
Área de Conservación Arenal-Tempisque (ACAT)
Conservation area

Corredor Biológico Pájaro Campana

An altitudinal corridor carrying the three-wattled bellbird's migration from the Monteverde cloud forest down to the Gulf of Nicoya mangroves.

Connects · Reserva Biológica Bosque Nuboso Monteverde · Golfo de Nicoya

PNCB / SINAC — Corredores Biológicos (screening reference) · approximate screening extent — confirm against the official SINAC / PNCB record

See the corridor network →

Talk it through with Gregorio

This reading is built from satellite and open data. It cannot see soil biology, legal tenure, or what you already know from walking the land — a 30-minute call tests the reading against the ground and sequences the work. No cost, no obligation.

Sources & method · 7 layers
Place — OpenStreetMap / Nominatim

Nominatim reverse geocode

settlement · live
ODbL 1.0
Terrain — AWS Terrarium (Mapzen)

Terrarium elevation tiles

~10 m (z12) · 2017
Open (attribution)
Climate — Open-Meteo

Archive 2004–2024 + MPI-ESM1-2-XR to 2050

~9 km · 2004–2024 / 2045–2049
CC-BY 4.0 (data); non-commercial API tier
Land cover — ESA WorldCover

WorldCover 2021 v200

10 m · 2021
CC-BY 4.0 (commercial promotion: notify due@esa.int)
Water, roads & protected areas — OpenStreetMap

Overpass (waterways, highways, places, protected areas)

vector · live
ODbL 1.0
Biodiversity — GBIF

Occurrence records (count + top species)

point · live
Mixed CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-NC (per dataset)
Surface water — JRC Global Surface Water

Global Surface Water v1.4 — occurrence & seasonality

30 m · 1984–2021
Copernicus / open (attribution)

Every number above is public, open data — named, dated, and licensed. What TERRA does not publish is the lens: the weights, curves, and verdict thresholds that turn these layers into a Land Score. That judgment is calibrated from land walked on the ground, and it stays proprietary.

Unavailable for this parcel: soilgrids — the affected pillars were reweighted, not guessed.

Generated Fri, 26 Jun 2026 03:35:58 GMT · 12.0s · synthesized by TERRA.

Location context